Map­ping the Murine Car­diac 26S Pro­tea­some Complexes

The impor­tance of pro­tea­so­mes in gover­ning the intra­ce­llu­lar pro­tein degra­da­tion pro­cess has been inc­rea­singly recog­ni­zed. Recent inves­ti­ga­tions indi­cate that pro­tea­some com­ple­xes may exist in a spe­cies– and cell-​​type-​​specific fashion. To date, des­pite evi­dence lin­king impai­red pro­tein degra­da­tion to car­diac disease phe­noty­pes, vir­tually nothing is known regar­ding the mole­cu­lar com­po­si­tion, func­tion, or regu­la­tion of car­diac pro­tea­so­mes. We have taken a func­tio­nal pro­teo­mic approach to cha­rac­te­rize 26S pro­tea­so­mes in the murine heart. Mul­ti­di­men­sio­nal chro­ma­to­graphy was used to obtain highly puri­fied and func­tio­nally via­ble car­diac 20S and 19S pro­tea­some com­ple­xes, which were sub­jec­ted to elec­tropho­re­sis and tan­dem mass spec­tro­metry analy­ses. Our data revea­led com­plex mole­cu­lar orga­ni­za­tion of car­diac 26S pro­tea­so­mes, some of which are simi­lar to what were repor­ted in yeast, whe­reas others exhi­bit con­tras­ting fea­tu­res that have not been pre­viously iden­ti­fied in other spe­cies or cell types. At least 36 dis­tinct subu­nits (17 of 20S and 19 of 19S) are coex­pres­sed and assem­bled as 26S pro­tea­so­mes in this vital car­diac orga­ne­lle, whe­reas the expres­sion of PA200 and 11S subu­nits were detec­ted with limi­ted par­ti­ci­pa­tion in the 26S com­ple­xes. The 19S subu­nits inc­lu­ded a new alter­na­ti­vely spli­ced iso­form of Rpn10 (Rpn10b) along with its pri­mary iso­form (Rpn10a). Immu­no­blot­ting and immu­nocy­toche­mistry veri­fied the expres­sion of key alpha and beta subu­nits in car­diom­yocy­tes. The expres­sion of 14 cons­ti­tu­tive alpha and beta subu­nits in para­llel with their three indu­ci­ble subu­nits (beta1i, beta2i, and beta5i) in the nor­mal heart was not expec­ted; these fin­dings repre­sent a dis­tinct level of struc­tu­ral com­ple­xity of car­diac pro­tea­so­mes, sig­ni­fi­cantly dif­fe­rent from that of yeast and human eryth­rocy­tes. Further­more, liquid chromatography/​tandem mass spec­tros­copy cha­rac­te­ri­zed 3 dis­tinct types of post-​​translational modi­fi­ca­tions inc­lu­ding (1) N-​​terminal acety­la­tion of 19S subu­nits (Rpn1, Rpn5, Rpn6, Rpt3, and Rpt6) and 20S subu­nits (alpha2, alpha5, alpha7, beta3, and beta4); (2) N-​​terminal myris­toy­la­tion of a 19S subu­nit (Rpt2); and (3) phosphory­la­tion of 20S subu­nits (e.g. alpha7)). Taken together, this report pre­sents the first com­prehen­sive cha­rac­te­ri­za­tion of car­diac 26S pro­tea­so­mes, pro­vi­ding cri­ti­cal struc­tu­ral and pro­teo­mic infor­ma­tion fun­da­men­tal to our future unders­tan­ding of this essen­tial pro­tein degra­da­tion sys­tem in the nor­mal and disea­sed myocardium.

Regu­la­tion of Murine Car­diac 20S Proteasomes

Our recent stu­dies have pro­vi­ded a pro­teo­mic blue­print of the 26S pro­tea­some com­ple­xes in the heart, among which 20S pro­tea­so­mes were found to con­tain cylinder-​​shaped struc­tu­res con­sis­ting of both alpha and beta subu­nits. These pro­tea­so­mes exhi­bit a num­ber of fea­tu­res uni­que to the myo­car­dium, inc­lu­ding stri­king dif­fe­ren­ces in post-​​translational modi­fi­ca­tions (PTMs) of indi­vi­dual subu­nits and novel PTMs that have not been pre­viously repor­ted. To date, mecha­nisms con­tri­bu­ting to the regu­la­tion of this myo­car­dial pro­teoly­tic core sys­tem remain lar­gely unde­fi­ned; in par­ti­cu­lar, little is known regar­ding PTM-​​dependent regu­la­tion of car­diac pro­tea­so­mes. In this inves­ti­ga­tion, we seek to elu­ci­date the func­tion and regu­la­tion of 20S pro­tea­some com­ple­xes in the heart. Func­tio­nally via­ble murine car­diac 20S pro­tea­so­mes were puri­fied. Tan­dem mass spec­tro­metry analy­ses, com­bi­ned with native gel elec­tropho­re­sis, immu­no­pre­ci­pi­ta­tion, and immu­no­blot­ting, revea­led the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of 2 pre­viously unre­cog­ni­zed func­tio­nal part­ners in the endo­ge­nous intact car­diac 20S com­ple­xes: pro­tein phospha­tase 2A (PP2A), and pro­tein kinase A (PKA). Further­more, our results demons­tra­ted that PP2A and PKA pro­foundly impact the pro­teoly­tic func­tion of 20S pro­tea­so­mes: phosphory­la­tion of 20S com­ple­xes enhan­ces the pep­ti­dase acti­vity of indi­vi­dual subu­nits in a substrate-​​specific fashion. Moreo­ver, inhi­bi­tion of PP2A or the addi­tion of PKA sig­ni­fi­cantly modi­fied both the serine– and threonine-​​phosphorylation pro­file of pro­tea­so­mes; mul­ti­ple indi­vi­dual subu­nits of 20S (eg, alpha1 and beta2) were tar­gets of PP2A and PKA. Taken together, these stu­dies pro­vide the first demons­tra­tion that the func­tion of car­diac 20S pro­tea­so­mes is modu­la­ted by asso­cia­ting part­ners and that phosphory­la­tion may serve as a key mecha­nism for regulation.

Mam­ma­lian Pro­tea­some Heterogeneity

The proteasome-​​dependent pro­tein degra­da­tion par­ti­ci­pa­tes in mul­ti­ple essen­tial cellu­lar pro­ces­ses. Modu­la­tion of pro­tea­so­mal acti­vi­ties may alter car­diac func­tion and disease phe­noty­pes. Howe­ver, car­dio­vas­cu­lar stu­dies repor­ted thus far have yiel­ded con­flic­ting results. We hypothe­si­zed that a con­tri­bu­ting fac­tor to the con­tra­dic­ting lite­ra­ture may be cau­sed by exis­ting pro­tea­some hete­ro­ge­neity in the myo­car­dium. In this inves­ti­ga­tion, we pro­vide the very first direct demons­tra­tion of dis­tinct pro­tea­some sub­po­pu­la­tions in murine hearts. The car­diac pro­tea­some sub­po­pu­la­tions dif­fer in their mole­cu­lar com­po­si­tions and pro­teoly­tic acti­vi­ties. Further­more they were dis­tin­guished from pro­tea­some sub­po­pu­la­tions iden­ti­fied in murine livers. The study was faci­li­ta­ted by the deve­lop­ment of novel pro­to­cols for in-​​solution isoe­lec­tric focu­sing of mul­ti­pro­tein com­ple­xes in a lami­nar flow that sup­port an ave­rage reso­lu­tion of 0.04 pH units. Uti­li­zing these pro­to­cols, the majo­rity of car­diac pro­tea­some com­ple­xes dis­pla­yed an isoe­lec­tric point of 5.26 with addi­tio­nal sub­po­pu­la­tions focu­sing in the range from pH 5.10 to 5.33. In con­trast, the majo­rity of hepa­tic 20 S pro­tea­so­mes had a pI of 5.05 and focu­sed from pH 5.01 to 5.29. Impor­tantly pro­tea­some sub­po­pu­la­tions degra­ded spe­ci­fic model pep­ti­des with dif­fe­rent tur­no­ver rates. Among car­diac sub­po­pu­la­tions, pro­tea­so­mes with an appro­xi­mate pI of 5.21 sho­wed 40% higher trypsin-​​like acti­vity than those with pI 5.28. Dis­tinct pro­tea­some assembly may be a con­tri­bu­ting fac­tor to varia­tions in pro­teoly­tic acti­vi­ties because pro­tea­so­mes with pI 5.21 con­tai­ned 58% less of the indu­ci­ble subu­nit beta 2i com­pa­red with those with pI 5.28. In addi­tion, dephosphory­la­tion of 20 S pro­tea­so­mes demons­tra­ted that besi­des mole­cu­lar com­po­si­tion post­trans­la­tio­nal modi­fi­ca­tions lar­gely con­tri­bute to their pI values. These data sug­gest the pos­si­bi­lity of mixed 20 S pro­tea­some assembly, a depar­ture from the currently hypothe­si­zed two sub­po­pu­la­tions: cons­ti­tu­tive and immuno forms. The iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of mul­ti­ple dis­tinct pro­tea­some sub­po­pu­la­tions in heart pro­vi­des key mecha­nis­tic insights for achie­ving selec­tive and tar­ge­ted regu­la­tion of this essen­tial pro­tein degra­da­tion machi­nery. Thus, pro­tea­some sub­po­pu­la­tions may serve as novel the­ra­peu­tic tar­gets in the myocardium.